CIMG1979a_1300_158.jpg

Highland Park (Malts of Scotland) - 1989, Bourbon Hogshead - 23 y.o. - 53,2%
20F: 20E: 83/100


Highland-Park 1989, Bourbon Hogshead

SessionID
Bottler:
Malts of Scotland
Age:
23 years
Alcohol:
53,2%
Bottle details:
distillation: 04/1989 bottling: 05/2012
non chill filtered cask strength
Bourbon Hogshead
cask nr:12030
95 /281 bottles
average
83/100
(82,58)
price class:

20 notes disponibles en français
Back

Bishlouk

Color: Straw.

Nose: Orangeade mixed with white wine, with a iodine layer on top. The orangeade fades and the sea peat then prevails. I'm taken on the wrong foot with this one.

Mouth: First a water sweetness, then a fierce pepper attack in the cheeks. Minerals invade the mouth afterwards.

Finish: Rather short. The wine side comes back, followed by another pepper attack.

Verdict: Very particular. Very very complex. And I like complexity a lot ! I have the impression to drink a young fierce whisky, but this complexity could also make believe at an older and wiser whisky. The rather short weights the scale towards the young side, especially as a lot of things are gone after airing (this drops the note a few points). A whisky to quickly drink !

89/1002013

Samhain

Colour: light gold

Nose: A very intense sweetness (sugared almonds) is followed by a light bitter sweet fruitiness like candied tangerines.

Mouth: A sweet and creamy mouthfeel is followed by spicy notes of white pepper. Later fruity and floral notes appear.

The whole thing is rounded up by a long and malty finish.

84/1002013

Jbrice

Nose: quite discreet. A little sulfur in the register "scraped match scraped". Reminds me of a new spirit in some aspects but then more melted. Austere. Slightly floral. A little vanilla and frangipani.

Palate: Concentrated for sure! And cask! Rather fruity and more to my taste than the nose!

Finish: long on that taste of slightly floral and fruity spirit.

Comments: this is far from the whisky of the year and I'm not a fan of this kind of profile, but I must admit that there are no defects if it is perhaps to have been bottled too young or in an inactive barrel. However, I think I understood that kind of whisky has a lot of fans ..
83/1002013

Whiskywardrobe

“A great whisky without ambitions of anything else. Just pure natural pleasure”
This dram has a fino like color.

Nose (90): (5)more than average. honey, citrus, spices, wood, vanilla.

Taste (90): powerful, oily. honey, citrus, vanilla, spices, wood. 15 to 17 years old? 46%?

Finish (90): (5)longer than average. honey, spices, vanilla.

90/1002013

Jeep

Nose: It tickles! Stale beer, vomit ... Yuck! Becomes much more enjoyable by aerating (not difficult!): Very floral, very clean. There is a little cereal, fresh fruit (peaches, pears) and some citrus
Taste: Powerful. Some chemical: sour candy, floral, fruit cake. A lot of spices but what? The mouth is unbalanced.
Finish: Long and warm on spices.
Conclusion: Alcohol poorly integrated. I also struggle to cling to the aromas of this whisky
80/1002013

Jean-Marc

Nose: elusive and if you get too close attention to stitching some rebels esters ... leaving room for citrus, mostly lemon.

Palate: warm, very lemony

Finish: long and pleasant
85/1002013

Jmputz

Colour: Pale gold.
Clearly a floral nose unfortunately accompanied by tingling probably due to alcohol. Notes of honey. Apart from the obvious presence of alcohol, one could characterize the nose as discreet.
The first sip is undeniable close to what we found at the nose. Firstdiscreet and floral, after a few seconds it's a rise of alcohol that crushes everything. Flowers and honey
A fairly long finish, dominated by a few floral fragrances and still the slight presence of honey.
Damage that alcohol overwrites the palate throughout the tasting. With better integration, we have been dealing with a very decent whisky.
82/1002013

Jmputz

Colour: Pale gold.
Clearly a floral nose unfortunately accompanied by tingling probably due to alcohol. Notes of honey. If it were not for the presence of alcohol could characterize the nose discreet.
The first sip is undeniable nose. First and discreet floral, after a few seconds it's a rise of alcohol that crushes everything. Flowers and honey
A fairly long finish, dominated by a few floral fragrances and always the slight presence of honey.
Damage that alcohol overwrites the palate throughout the tasting. With better integration, we have been dealing with a very decent whiskey.
82/1002012

Savoureur

appearance: Riesling
nose: low to medium intensity, fairly well integrated alcohol (present but not disturbing), fine peat, sea freshness, oyster juice, malty sweetness after breathing
taste: medium intensity, well integrated alcohol, black pepper dominates without overwriting the other flavors already present on the nose, malty sweetness comes mostly at the end of taste, not bad at all but the fact that I do not like spicy pepper in my whisky penalizes my final note
finish:
medium

84/1002013

Jean-Marie Putz

Colour: Pale yellow
The nose is light, floral. Pleasant smell of cut grass and heather. Everything is fairly quiet and little complex. However this is very nice nose.
The palate is fresh, still with these floral notes mixed with a little honey. Nice mouth, but no real surprise. It is relatively linear but its pleasant freshness makes it a perfect aperitif whisky.
The finish is rather short, with the same characteristics as the mouth fresh and fun.
A whisky easy of access if not extraordinary.
81/1002011

NovA

Color: white wine

Nose: a fresh nose, with metallic character, sauerkraut, green young apples, maybe lime, a little bit of sauerkraut, wood ruff, ginger, and some tea leafs
with water: more pleasant, fruitier , fresh wine gum, buttery, creamy vanilla, apples, pineapple,

palate: strong alcohol, comes with buttery vanilla, green apple, some herbs, austere, a bitterness – everything is much quieter than the alcohol.
with water: less alcohol but it is still present, the bitterness is to strong, some smoke, wood, citrus,

Finish: long, strong, alcohol, bitter limes
with water: still bitter, alcohol, and not much more long

77/1002013

Arno

Nose: starts very slowly with notes of verbena lime infusion type, of herbs. It then goes on something closer to the peat, with a hint of smoke. Aeration reveals more caramel and even some floral notes. The nose is really shy.
Palate: very soft smoke with notes of dry peat, with a sweet background that accompanies the set. A little rebuked by spices and pepper, before returning to a welcome touch of bitterness, malty, with a molasses side. Good round mouth, sweet end to end.
Finale: the smoke tree, drier than the rest
Conclusion: easy to understand peat, without great defect but without much originality. A bit austere.
82/1002013

Dagde

Nose: Lemon confit, anise now, honey. This is very sweet and dense throughout. the vegetal is not exploding heavily on freshness. The opening reveals a bit of malt and milk chocolate. Some farm notes (back), peach, salt and a hint of minerality are added though everything is compact. Meanwhile again, the salt becomes really ultra present.

Mouth: very rich texture with chocolate milk, salt, honey and anise. It's not bad but it is unfortunately very salty that imbalance all. Adding water is not particularly beneficial.

Final: Final well salted, smoked a little sporadic with vegetal notes of honey and lemon. The salt remains strongly aftertaste with lemon. Overall it's pretty off the finish.

Comment: A whisky that has a beautiful nose, complex and multifaceted. In the mouth, the ubiquitous salt does not integrate well in that rather pleasant aromatic device but without power. The finale, too, is very present but scattered perfumes.
81/1002013

Singlemalt71

Nose: From the start flowery aromas, vanilla and wood tones with fruitiness (young and sour). The sour side increases sharply after some time! Later on some more smells of yeast also.

Taste: Subtle sourness, yeast (it makes me think of that), some sweetness and wood tones.

Finish: Medium long and spiciness.

84/1002013

Kundalini

Notes of Williams pears, mirabelle plums, very, very sweet, little glue notes.
84/1002013

Applecross

Nose: reminds me on paper glue, but also fruity flavors, pineapple. Little alcohol which stays in the background

Palate: sweet, again pineapple, bit more artificial than in the nose, a cocktail of flavors which disappear to quick to be named somehow salty

Finish: medium to Long, develops some bitter notes and keeps them after the other flavors are long gone, not really my taste

Remarks: A bit too bitter for me and I wouldn't buy it most likely

80/1002013

Jean-Michel

Colour: White wine.
Nose: Starts dry and hot. Greenish and quite rooty. There’s lots of alcohol in there. Lots of wood extracts as well, but not the one I fancy the best. Quintal of liquorice, and tons of pepper. Printing ink and dusty crumpled old newspapers. And perhaps a slight coastal tang. Given time, you might catch a hint of low end apricot flavoured yoghourt. Not really entertaining, huh?
Mouth: Surprisingly soft. Well, not that surprising actually, as heavy alcohol sometimes delivers this strange warm softness. Starts on lots of vanilla. More and more pepper as the alcohol grows bigger.
Finish: Long and hot, getting drier and drier, and ending up on a big grassy bitterness.
Comment: Hot peppery slightly briny stuff. As there been a Cask Strength Tobermory released these days? Well, anyway, this one is not for me...

71/1002013

Mars

Nose: Pear, white fruit, lemon.

Taste: Vanilla, white fruits.

Final: Pear, white fruits, spices.

Comments: Simple but nice. Better to avoid a long breathing!

86/1002013

Wiski

Colour: Pale gold.

Nose: On the smoked malt, but not too much. Quite some grass, mint, eucalyptus. Licorice. Grows on tropical fruits (guava, mango, lime).

Mouth: The mouth is per cons on smoke, sea, on algae and some menthol. The whole is ashy, peppery, spicy. Still the more intense tropical fruit. Almost looks like a white agricultural rum exotic fruits. Alcohol is this time very well integrated. More iodine. Final ash and meat.
85/1002013

Piazzolla

Nose: very mineral and rather herbaceous (Lowland?). A little spicy. Some fruit notes also (pear ....). Lack of presence.
Mouth as nose is not really satisfying. It's not bad, but it lacks character and power. Salt
Fairly short final
Conclusion: A flawless malt except that will not appeal to the most demanding or enthusiasts seeking density!
82/1002013

Back

00523943a_1300_158.jpg